Charles Lloyd Secrest, MD
Mybswhealth
Locations of Charles Lloyd Secrest, MD
Baylor Scott & White Center for Reconstructive Urology
1101 6th Ave Ste 110, Fort Worth, TX, 76104- Lunes: 8:00 am - 4:30 pm
- Martes: 8:00 am - 4:30 pm
- Miércoles: 8:00 am - 4:30 pm
- Jueves: 8:00 am - 4:30 pm
- Viernes: 8:00 am - 12:00 pm
Horas de oficina
Biografía
| Idiomas hablados |
|---|
| Inglés |
| Educación |
|---|
| Medical School: MD, University of Mississippi School of Medicine (1986) |
| Medical School: University of Mississippi School of Medicine (1986) |
| Internship: General Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center (1988) |
| Residency: Urology, University of Mississippi Med Ctr School of Med (1991) |
| Residency: Urology, University of Mississippi Med Ctr School of Med (1991) |
| Fellowship: Reconstructive Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School (1992) |
| Certificaciones | |
|---|---|
| Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery- American Board of Urology | Urology- American Board of Urology |
| Afiliaciones hospitalarias |
|---|
| Baylor University Medical Center, parte de Baylor Scott & White Health |
| Baylor Scott & White Centro Médico All Saints - Fort Worth |
| Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Templo |
Seguros aceptados
Baylor Scott & White ha establecido acuerdos con varios tipos de seguros para garantizar que sus necesidades de salud estén cubiertas.
Por favor, póngase en contacto con su proveedor para confirmar si su seguro es aceptado.
Adaptemos su asistencia sanitaria a usted.
Utilice MyBSWHealth para obtener una experiencia de atención personalizada.
Evaluaciones de pacientes (399)
The patient rating score is an average of all responses to physician-related questions on our nationally recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey .
| Puntuación media | métrico | |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | Amabilidad / Cortesía del proveedor de atención | |
| 4.5 | Tiempo de espera en la clínica | |
| 4.8 | Proveedor de cuidado del tiempo pasado con el paciente | |
| 4.9 | El proveedor mostró preocupación | |
| 4.8 | El proveedor lo incluyó en las decisiones | |
| 4.9 | Proveedor de atención de tarifa |
Comentarios de los pacientes (241)
Descripción general de los comentarios de los pacientes
Resumen creado con IA
Patient comments are gathered from our Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey and are displayed in their entirety. Patients are de-identified for confidentiality and patient privacy.
Los pacientes agradecen
Dr. Charles Secrest receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from patients who consistently praise his exceptional bedside manner, professionalism, and clinical expertise. Patients frequently describe him as caring, compassionate, kind, and personable, noting that he makes them feel comfortable discussing sensitive health issues. His communication skills are highly valued, with numerous reviews highlighting that he takes time to listen carefully, explains conditions and procedures thoroughly in understandable terms, and answers all questions without rushing patients. Many patients appreciate his skill as a surgeon, with several noting successful surgical outcomes and expressing gratitude for his expertise in resolving complex urological issues. His staff also receives consistent praise for being friendly, helpful, professional, and caring. Patients frequently mention feeling genuinely cared for as individuals rather than just another appointment, and several note that Dr. Secrest comes highly recommended by other physicians.
Los pacientes también comparten
The primary area for improvement identified in the reviews relates to wait times, with several patients reporting delays of 45 to 75 minutes before being seen by Dr. Secrest, sometimes without communication about the reason or expected length of the wait. One patient noted that while the office can be very busy and waits are sometimes long, they remain pleased with their results. Additionally, one review mentioned a lack of follow-up after surgery, indicating that while Dr. Secrest has excellent skills and bedside manner, post-operative communication could be enhanced. These concerns appear relatively infrequent compared to the volume of positive feedback but represent consistent themes worth addressing.