Cedric Tarryl Day, MD
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Mybswhealth
Next available appointments
Times may vary. Displayed times are for in-person visits. Additional times may be available for both new and current patients.
Thu, 2/05
- 1:00 PM
Mon, 2/09
- 10:00 AM
- 1:00 PM
Tue, 2/10
- 1:00 PM
Locations of Cedric Tarryl Day, MD
Clínica especializada Baylor Scott & White - Harker Heights
907 Mountain Lion Cir, Harker Heights, Texas, 76548- Lunes: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
- Martes: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
- Miércoles: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
- Jueves: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
- Viernes: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Clínica de especialidades Baylor Scott & White - Killeen Hemingway
2405 S Clear Creek Rd, Killeen, TX, 76549- Lunes: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
- Martes: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
- Miércoles: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
- Jueves: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
- Viernes: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Horas de oficina
Biografía
| Edades vistas |
|---|
| Adultos |
| Geriatría |
| Idiomas hablados |
|---|
| Inglés |
| Educación |
|---|
| Facultad de Medicina: MD, Centro de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad de Texas (San Antonio) (2009) |
| Residencia: OB / Gyn, Texas A y M College of Medicine / scott And White (2013) |
| Certificaciones |
|---|
| Obstetricia y Ginecología - Junta Estadounidense de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| Afiliaciones hospitalarias |
|---|
| Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Templo |
Seguros aceptados
Baylor Scott & White ha establecido acuerdos con varios tipos de seguros para garantizar que sus necesidades de salud estén cubiertas.
Por favor, póngase en contacto con su proveedor para confirmar si su seguro es aceptado.
Adaptemos su asistencia sanitaria a usted.
Utilice MyBSWHealth para obtener una experiencia de atención personalizada.
Evaluaciones de pacientes (200)
The patient rating score is an average of all responses to physician-related questions on our nationally recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey .
| Puntuación media | métrico | |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | Proveedor de cuidado del tiempo pasado con el paciente | |
| 4.7 | Tiempo de espera en la clínica | |
| 4.7 | El proveedor mostró preocupación | |
| 4.7 | El proveedor lo incluyó en las decisiones | |
| 4.9 | Amabilidad / Cortesía del proveedor de atención | |
| 4.8 | Proveedor de atención de tarifa |
Comentarios de los pacientes (84)
Descripción general de los comentarios de los pacientes
Resumen creado con IA
Patient comments are gathered from our Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey and are displayed in their entirety. Patients are de-identified for confidentiality and patient privacy.
Los pacientes agradecen
Dr. Cedric Day receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from patients who consistently praise his exceptional bedside manner and interpersonal skills. Patients repeatedly describe him as kind, caring, compassionate, patient, and professional. Many reviews highlight his ability to make patients feel comfortable during sensitive or embarrassing discussions about women's health issues, with several noting he helped alleviate feelings of shame or nervousness. His communication skills are frequently commended, with patients appreciating that he listens attentively to concerns, explains things thoroughly in easy-to-understand terms, answers all questions, and is straightforward and honest without being condescending. Multiple patients mention his genuine care for their wellbeing, with some noting he follows up personally and takes time to review medical records before appointments. Several long-term patients express strong loyalty and trust in his care, and he is frequently recommended to friends and family.
Los pacientes también comparten
The reviews reveal very few areas for improvement, with the vast majority being highly positive. One patient noted that Dr. Day was "not forthcoming with information unless you ask questions," suggesting he may benefit from proactively providing more information even when patients don't specifically ask. A couple of reviews mentioned brief interactions or situations where he was unable to complete care (such as not being able to deliver a baby), though these comments were made without significant criticism. One review referenced an unrelated HIPAA issue at the facility level that did not involve the doctor directly.